00:00
00:00
Annie-Mae
I love to draw Video Games, Cartoons, and weird stuff.

Age 39, Female

CA

Joined on 11/20/18

Level:
20
Exp Points:
4,035 / 4,440
Exp Rank:
13,462
Vote Power:
6.14 votes
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
4
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
60

Comments

"34 years old"

You'll be me too one day... OLD.

@Annie-Mae that defeats the whole purpose of the newgrounds art portal. voting is supposed to be quick and easy, so the top ranking stuff is quickly updated according to votes and views. the caveat of this system is, as you say, that it isn't very helpful if no reviews are given and just an average rating of 0-5 stars. i however also believe that just making a review for the sake of voting isn't always helpful either, most people aren't very well versed in how to review art and would just state garbage gibberish. we aren't working with high arts academic doctorate people here on newgrounds (and that's fine imo)

i would also like to note that i haven't seen your art before, and while just skimming through some images rn i notice that you have a pretty low amount numbers of votes (some lower than 10), and that makes it hard to make a statement if your votes are representative of newgrounds as a whole or you're just unlucky and gained a couple of lurkers downvoting your stuff (maybe a few high-leveled users with lots of voting power?). i fully understand how that is still very frustrating.

also, i am pretty sure newgrounds userbase is more than 90% male, and if that isn't gay i don't know what. i know that henryEYES is propably gay nonetheless.

Guess I missed the memo on the purpose of the rating system. I appreciate that top art is sfw stuff, so I'm referring just only to NSFW stuff which won't show up on the main page.

People won't leave bad reviews if they have to have their name associated with their trolling shit talk. If they come by to leave a 0 star rating and comment "fuck you" then that's how they want to live and I think they should have to bare the burden of being known as a shit poster or troll.

Now I can't speak for artists who loose their shit over ONE bad shit post, but if I'm supposed to create work for ME and just put it up online for others to see, getting the artwork body slammed with a 0 rating by some random hater is enough to discourage anyone from sticking around here.

To be completely fair, I gave you 3 stars on art you made that also wasn't related to men.

neutral rating on art that is gay =/= homophobia

Very weak minded take

I've never seen you before but you taking the bait sort of proves who really is the weak minded person.

I like how nobody in the comments addressed the phenomenon of ONLY your art of naked men getting down-voted. I spent a lot of time on here in college and while it's open to anyone there's definitely one kind of person that Newgrounds attracts. It'd be acceptable if only their behaviour wasn't exactly contradictory to the aims and mottoes of the site.

@sonic354 @Annie-Mae So you're telling me you wasted your time making up paragraphs because of someone rating your art pieces 3 stars IRONICALLY?

It's not time wasted when we start the conversation. :)

@sonic354 @Annie-Mae @Annie-Mae 4/10 attempt at whatever you was trying. I'm going to go complain somewhere else.

@Annie-Mae yeah, the system is from how tom fulp had to manually upload content he enjoyed on the page submitted by people back in the day. although i think the featured art on the main page (except p-bot's daily picks?) is still chosen manually, based on trending content.

people will pretty surely leave shit reviews nonetheless, there's lots of lurkers that have no skin in the game and they are by all accounts anonymous.

I mean you can't expect everyone to like everything. I know furries and my little pony stuff is still hated here, But as long as you do it. getting whatever score really shouldnt matter